Boca Raton Bankruptcy Fraud Attorney: Government Objects to Reality Star Theresa Guidice’s Motion for Separate Trial

February 11, 2014

Real Housewives of New Jersey Reality Star Theresa Guidice and her husband “juicy” Joe Guidice are charged in U.S. District Court with Bankruptcy Fraud, Mortgage Fraud and Conspiracy to Commit Wire and Mail Fraud.

The defendants’ motion for separate trials is at the center of the high profile couple’s most recent legal woes. Initially they were charged with trying to hide assets while in bankruptcy. The newest charges, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, making false statements on loan applications stem from Government allegations that the couple prepared a mortgage loan application stating that Teresa Giudice worked as a real estate agent and made $15,000 a month. In reality, authorities claim she was not employed.

Call the Boca Raton Bankruptcy Attorneys at Whittel & Melton

Call the Boca Raton Bankruptcy Fraud Attorneys at Whittel & Melton

News reports claim that the Giudices have been charged with over 41 different counts of fraud and, if convicted, could spend the next 50 years in prison.

Set for trial in April, the couple’s lawyers argued that Joe Giudice wants to be able to exonerate his wife through his testimony–but wouldn’t be able to do so if he decides not to take the stand at their joint trial.  In addition, their attorneys motioned the court for separate trials because Teresa’s testimony to clear her name could conflict with her marital privilege not to testify against her husband.

In response, the U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a strongly-worded objection claiming the couple is not entitled to separate trials.

“Such difficulty does not infringe upon a fundamental right, and it manifestly does not require the Court to hold two separate trials on identical offenses for the sake of preserving marital harmony.”

The prosecutors also cite Joe Giudice’s history of false testimony, notably in a bankruptcy matter involving a former business partner, as another reason to deny the separation of the trials. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Morris Stern is quoted, calling Joe Giudice “unbounded as a prevaricator” with a “say-anything, do-anything” attitude on the stand. Finally, prosecutors say the two should be tried together for “judicial economy.”

It will be interesting to see how the Court rules on this motion. Generally, Florida and Federal Courts recognize that partners can claim a privilege from testifying about certain spousal communications in order to protect marital relationships from the harm that would befall them if spouses could be forced to testify against each other. However, Judges have to balance the sanctity of these relationships with the competing need to avoid the harm caused when evidence is withheld from trials. Balancing these competing needs has resulted in various exceptions to, and underlying requirements for, the spousal privilege.

Have you been charged with Bankruptcy Fraud in Boca Raton? Call us today to discuss your options. Local: (561) 367-8777 or statewide, toll-free: (866) 608-5529.

Justia Lawyer Rating
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Super Lawyers
American Association of Justice
Florida Legal Elite
Avvo Rating
AV Martindale-Hubbell
Florida Justice Association
Best Law Firms 2015
BBB - Accredited Business
Best Lawyers
NAMIL LAW Founding Member
NAMIL LAW Founding Member
Top 100
Client Reviews
This firm was extremely helpful and courteous to deal with. I did not expect to need their services, but was fortunate to find such a great firm. Thank you for your services. E.S.
Great customer service. I was always kept updated on every new detail throughout my whole case. The staff made me feel very comfortable and confident in choosing their services. Highly recommend. C.B.
I have been to this office three different times and have not one complaint ! Always prompt and on point. I wouldn't pick any other office! R.S.
The staff was very attentive and answered all my questions regarding my criminal case. I was very pleased with the outcome and professionalism. C.V.
Could never see myself using any other law firm. My case was a difficult one it was handled with perfection and extreme professionalism. R.B.